Journal Search Engine
View PDF Download PDF Export Citation Korean Bibliography PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1738-1894(Print)
ISSN : 2288-5471(Online)
Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Vol.18 No.3 pp.407-414

Behaviour of Uranyl Phosphate Containing Solid Waste During Thermal Treatment for the Purpose of Sentencing and Immobilisation: Preliminary Results

Richard Ian Foster*, Hyun-Hee Sung, Kwang-Wook Kim, Keunyoung Lee
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 111, Daedeok-daero 989beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding Author. Richard Ian Foster, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, E-mail:, Tel: +82-42-868-8210

February 13, 2020 ; June 15, 2020 ; July 20, 2020


Thermal decomposition of the uranyl phosphate mineral phase meta-ankoleite (KUO2PO4·3H2O) has been considered in relation to high temperature thermal sintering for the immobilisation of a uranyl phosphate containing waste. Meta-ankoleite thermal decomposition was studied across the temperature range 25 – 1200℃ under an inert N2 atmosphere at 1 atm. It is shown that the meta-ankoleite mineral phase undergoes a double de-hydration event at 56.90 and 125.85℃. Subsequently, synthetically produced pure meta-ankoleite remains stable until at least 1150℃ exhibiting no apparent phase changes. In contrast, when present in a mixed waste the meta-ankoleite phase is not identifiable after thermal treatment indicating incorporation within the bulk waste either as an amorphous phase and/or as uranium oxide. Visual inspection of the waste post thermal treatment showed evidence of self-sintering owing to the presence of glass former materials, namely, silica (SiO2) and antimony(V) oxide (Sb2O5). Therefore, incorporation of the uranium phase into the waste as part of waste sentencing and immobilisation via high temperature sintering for the purpose of long-term disposal is deemed feasible.


    National Research Foundation of Korea

    1. Introduction

    The formation of sparingly soluble uranyl phosphates offer a route for the removal of uranium from complex aqueous waste streams [1-7]. Our recently reported method involves the removal of uranium from an industrial waste effluent via the formation of synthetic meta-ankoleite (KUO2PO4·3H2O) [8, 9]. Final immobilisation of such a waste is of the utmost importance to ensure complete compliance with national and international concessions for radioactive waste handling and disposal.

    The purpose of any immobilisation process is to stabilise the waste and prevent the release of contaminants into the environment during long-term storage and disposal. Knowledge of the chemical composition and mineral phases present in the final wasteform is required in order to forecast leaching, corrosion and general degradation phenomena of the wasteform over geological time scales. It is therefore important to characterise the mineral phases present before, during and after any immobilisation process, and understand what, if any, physicochemical changes take place. Immobilisation techniques include cementation, polymer-fixation, bituminisation, vitrification and ceramication; the latter of which exposes the wastes to high temperature processing [10-14]. Ceramication is the chosen immobilisation method for the waste in question [15-17].

    Thermal immobilisation methods expose the waste to elevated temperatures, e.g. 1100℃ in the present case. Phase changes or chemical decomposition due to exposure to these elevated temperatures may result in the formation of less stable or more soluble mineral phases which would compromise the integrity of the final wasteform and leave it unfit for long term storage or disposal. Understanding the thermal behaviour of KUO2PO4·3H2O is necessary to ensure compatibility of the resulting uranium mineral phases with the target wasteform, and to confirm regulatory compliance.

    The thermal stability of selected uranyl phosphates have been previously reported by Schaekers [18-20] (HUO2PO4·4H2O, NH4UO2PO4·3H2O, (UO2)3(PO4)2·4H2O, (UO2)2P2O7 and U(HPO4)2); Kamo et al.[21] (UO2(H2PO4)2· xH2O and UO2(PO3)2); and by Barten et al.[22] ((UO2)3(PO4)2, (UO2)2P2O7 and UO2(PO3)2); the latter of which reported oxygen partial pressures. Uranyl phosphates decompose at elevated temperatures depending on oxygen pressure and cation present [22]. Examples being the stability of (UO2)3(PO4)2·4H2O above 1000℃ in air, yet decomposing to a mix of U3O8 and 3U2O3P2O7 in Ar and N2 below 1000℃ [20]; or the decomposition of NH4UO2PO4·3H2O starting as early as 250℃ owing to a loss of ammonia [19]. As yet there is no apparent reporting of KUO2PO4·3H2O thermal stability in the literature. As such, we report the stability of synthetic meta-ankoleite in relation to thermal immobilisation techniques for the formation of uranium containing wasteforms for final radioactive waste disposal.

    2. Experimental

    All materials were used as received with no further purification: Uranyl nitrate hexahydrate (UNH, UO2(NO3)2·6H2O) was obtained from Alfa Aesar; potassium phosphate (KH2PO4, 99.5%), potassium nitrate (KNO3, 99%), and phosphoric acid (H3PO4, 85%) were obtained from SHOWA; nitric acid (HNO3, 65%) from MERCK; and iso-propyl alcohol (IPA, 99.5%) from oriental chemical industries. Ultra-pure water (18.2 MΩ) prepared by a Milli-QPLUS (Millipore Co.) was used throughout.

    The formation of synthetic meta-ankoleite was adapted for scale up from our previous publication (Eq. 1) [23]. Synthesis was as follows: To a 600 mL glass beaker 12.505 g of UNH was added followed by 250 mL KNO3 (2 M). Stirring was provided by a magnetic stirrer bar at 400 rpm. A total of 250 mL of H3PO4 (1 M) was slowly added to the UNH/KNO3 solution before being left to stir for a further 24 hours. The formed particles were then left to settle for an additional 24 hours undisturbed. The supernatant was discarded and replaced with 500 mL KNO3 (2 M, pH 2.5–3) and left for approximately 2 weeks with periodic stirring. The formed fluorescent yellow precipitates were then collected by vacuum filtration, washed with ultra-pure water (3×50 mL) and once with IPA (1×50 mL) before being left to air dry. The formation of crystalline synthetic meta-ankoleite was confirmed by SEM, XRD (Fig. 1), elemental analysis and TGA: UO22+ 58.79% (58.95% theor.), PO43- 20.42% (20.74% theor.), K+ 6.17% (8.52% theor.) and H2O 12.11% (11.79% theor.). Samples of the real waste, containing uranyl phosphate, were formed as part of laboratory and pilot plant trials [9, 24]. The chemical composition of the real waste is reported in Table 1.

    K +  + UO 2 2+  + PO 4 3-  + 3H 2 O KUO 2 PO 4 3 H 2 O Log K sp  = 24.30

    Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a SDT Q600 (TA Instruments Korea) TGA-DSC instrument. Approximately 10 mg of air-dried sample was placed into a 70 μL alumina crucible. Measurements were performed under a dry N2 atmosphere at a flow rate of 100 mL·min-1. Sample mass loss was recorded from room temperature to pre-determined isothermal plateaus upto 1200℃ at a heating rate of 10℃·min-1.

    Mineral phase identification was performed using a Bruker D2 Phaser. Data was collected at room temperature over the range of 2θ = 5–80° with a step size of 0.01 and a counting time of 0.2 seconds per step. Collected X-ray diffraction patterns of the mineral phases were matched to International Centre for Diffraction Data database (ICDD, PDF-2 2002, Sets 1-52 plus 65 plus 70-89) using DIFFRAC. EVA V3 software.

    3. Results & Discussion

    3.1 Uranyl phosphate formation

    Powder XRD phase analysis of the synthetic uranyl phosphate powders confirmed the formation of the mineral phase meta-ankoleite (KUO2PO4·3H2O) (Fig. 1(a)). Sharp intense peaks indicated the presence of well-defined crystal structures synonymous with uranyl phosphates [4, 23]. The crystalline nature of the sample was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy which revealed platelet-type crystals as similarly reported in our previous study (Fig. 1(a)) [23]. However, owing to the synthetic route employed, which resulted in shorter formation times, the long range order was substantially less than previously reported. Elemental analysis revealed a 1:1 U:P ratio along with TG analysis confirming the presence of three H2O groups. However, the measured potassium concentration was less than theoretical indicating a less than perfect formation yield of 72.43% (K0.72H0.28UO2PO4·3H2O).

    The precipitates obtained during the treatment of the real waste resembled a fine powder that was distinctively amorphous in appearance. Powder XRD phase analysis of the real waste confirmed the formation of the crystalline uranyl phosphate mineral phase meta-ankoleite (Fig. 1(b)); although the lower relative intensity and broader peaks indicates a more amorphous character and/or a decrease in grain size compared to the meta-ankoleite formed under idealistic synthetic conditions. The co-contaminant antimony was found to be present in the +5 oxidation state as antimony(V) oxide (Sb2O5), but again peak broadening indicates amorphous character and small grain sizes. The other co-contaminants (Table 1), in particular silicon, were not identifiable in the XRD as crystalline phases either due to being present as amorphous phases (i.e. Silica, SiO2) or below the detection limit. The amorphous appearance of the precipitates was confirmed by SEM analysis (Fig. 1(b)). This is likely explained due to the rapid and turbulent formation conditions in which the precipitates are formed and also the presence of un-dissolve amorphous silica particles from previous process steps; as seen previously [9].

    3.2 Thermal treatment

    Thermogravimetic analysis of synthetic uranyl phosphate revealed two distinct de-hydration events both occurring below 150℃ (Fig. 2(a)). The first occurs between 28–81℃ (onset: 56.90℃) and with a mass loss of 9.766% (1.217 mg) equivalent to loosing 2.5 H2O molecules (theoretical weight loss: 9.825%) (Eq. 2). The second de-hydration event occurs between 81–131℃ (onset: 125.85℃) with a mass loss of 2.343% (0.2921 mg) which is assigned to losing the remaining 0.5 H2O (theoretical weight loss: 2.179%) (Eq. 3). Sharp well-defined endothermic heat flow peaks accompany both de-hydration events. The de-hydration of meta-ankoleite is seen to follow the same steps as both acid uranyl phosphate (AUP, HUO2PO4·4H2O) and uranyl ammonium phosphate (UAP, NH4UO4PO4·3H2O) as reported by Schaekers [19].

    Step I KUO 2 PO 4 3H 2 O KUO 2 PO 4 0.5 H 2 O + 2 .5H 2 O

    Step II KUO 2 PO 4 0.5 H 2 O KUO 2 PO 4 + 0.5 H 2 O

    A third mass loss of 1.131% (0.141 mg) was observed with an onset of 322.94℃ (Fig. 2(a)). No further decomposition route for dehydrated meta-ankoleite (KUO2PO4) would logically result in only a 1% mass loss. In contrast, Schaekers previously reported a further two decomposition steps for AUP beyond the initial double-dehydration event (Eqs. 4, 5). The latter decomposition steps result in the release of water and oxygen molecules as noted by Eq. 6 and 7, respectively. The decomposition of HUO2PO4 (Eq. 6) is reported to occur over the temperature range of 192–610℃, while decomposition of the resulting (UO2)2P2O7 compound into U2O2P2O7 and oxygen (Eq. 7) is reported over the temperature range of 800–931℃ [19]. Both decomposition events occur within the temperature range of the third mass loss seen in the TG result of KUO2PO4·3H2O (Fig. 2(a)).

    Step I HUO 2 PO 4 4 H 2 O HUO 2 PO 4 H 2 O + 3 H 2 O

    Step II HUO 2 PO 4 H 2 O HUO 2 PO 4 + H 2 O

    Step III 2 HUO 2 PO 4 ( UO 2 ) 2 P 2 O 7 +H 2 O

    Step IV 2 ( UO 2 ) 2 P 2 O 7 2U 2 O 3 P 2 O 7 +O 2

    Considering Eqs. 6 and 7, the decomposition of a single HUO2PO4 would lead to the formation of ½H2O and ¼O2 molecules (Eq. 8). This would represent a theoretical mass loss of 4.64%. Based on the elemental analysis results, the meta-ankoleite yield was approximately 72% with the remaining yield likely comprising of AUP, based on experimental conditions used, resulting in a mixed solid with an approximate empirical formula of K0.72H0.28UO2PO4·3H2O. Assuming a K:H ratio of 0.72:0.28 and the subsequent decomposition of AUP as described by Schaekers, then a theoretical mass loss of 1.299% (4.6% × 0.28) over the temperature range of 192–931℃ can be predicted. It is therefore concluded that the third mass loss of 1.131% (0.141 mg) observed in Fig. 2(a) is in fact associated with the decomposition of AUP present due to incomplete formation of meta-ankoleite and not as a result of meta-ankoleite itself thermally decomposing.

    HUO 2 PO 4 1 2 U 2 O 3 P 2 O 7 + 1 2 H 2 O+ 1 4 O 2

    A fourth and final mass loss of 0.7253% (0.0904 mg) is observed in the TG of synthetic meta-ankoleite with an onset temperature of 1145.17℃. Under inert atmostpheres it has also been shown that U2O3P2O7 further decomposes with the loss of oxygen at temperatures above 1000℃ (Eq. 9) [19]. Combining Eqs. 8 and 9, the decomposition of a single HUO2PO4 would eventually give rise to an additional ¼O2 lost through the decomposition of U2O3P2O7 representing a theoretical mass loss of 2.19%. Again, assuming a K:H ratio of 0.72:0.28, then a theoretical mass loss of 0.612% at temperatures over 1000℃ can be predicted. This is slightly lower than the 0.725% mass loss recorded.

    2U 2 O 3 P 2 O 7 2 ( UO ) 2 P 2 O 7 + O 2

    Beyond the first two dehydration events no further mass loss associated with meta-ankoleite was observed until 1150℃ indicating that the remaining KUO2PO4 structure does not decompose before or during the targeted temperature range of 1000–1100℃ used for ceramication of the residue wastes [15-17]. Over 500℃ a large endothermic peak was observed likely due to melting or phase change phenomena.

    A similar thermal profile was obtained for the real waste (Fig. 2(b)). Double de-hydration events occurred over a wider temperature range 28–150℃. The events were accompanied by two endothermic heat flows. Both of these peaks were broader than those recorded for the synthetic uranyl phosphate indicating non-uniformed dehydration events were taking place. This is likely due to the amorphous nature of the sample leading to a non-homogeneous crystal structure. An as-yet un-assigned exothermic peak was identified at 345.15℃ associated with a mass loss of 8.165% (0.8071 mg), likely due to the decomposition of low molecular weight compounds and further dehydration events. Again, no further mass loss was observed until 1150℃ with the corresponding endothermic heat flow likely due to melting or phase change phenomena.

    3.3 Post thermal treatment analysis

    Powder XRD diffraction patterns of synthetic metaankoleite after thermal treatment at 1000, 1100 and 1200℃ are shown in Fig. 3. For comparison, the XRD pattern before thermal treatment is also shown. Analysis of the XRD patterns indicates that the meta-ankoleite phase remains stable on account of no changes to the recorded peaks. This suggests, along with the TG analysis results, that after a two-step de-hydration event synthetic meta-ankoleite does not further decompose or undergo further phase changes. Visual inspection of the sample before and after thermal treatment were comparable in appearance (Fig. 5(a), (b) & (c)), thus further supporting the idea that wide spread degradation of the crystal structure does not occur.

    Recorded XRD patterns of the real waste both before and after thermal treatment are shown in Fig. 4. Before thermal treatment uranium (14.5wt%) was present as meta-ankoleite while antimony (15.5wt%) was present as antimony(V) oxide (Sb2O5) [25]. No further crystalline phases were identifiable. The relative intensity and broadness of the peaks indicates a lack of long range crystallinity, particularly for those identifiable with antimony(V) oxide, which suggests the crystal phases possess a degree of amorphous character and also smaller grain sizes.

    After thermal treatment at 1100℃ a complete loss of peaks associated with the meta-ankoleite mineral phase was observed; with the emergence of a peak at 20.8° assigned to uranium oxide [17]. In contrast, antimony(V) oxide remains with associated peaks being clearly observed (Fig. 4).

    The real waste as received was a semi-amorphous powder (Fig. 5(d)). Following thermal treatment visual inspection indicates that a degree of self-sintering had taken place (Fig. 5(e) & (f)). Silica, antimony oxides and phosphates are all known glass former materials. It has been previously shown that they form a glass-ceramic composite upon thermal treatment [17].

    Based on these preliminary results, it would appear that the uranium phosphate mineral phase meta-ankoleite is incorporated within the bulk waste either as an amorphous phase and/or as uranium oxide. Incorporation of the uranium phase into the waste is suitable for real thermal processes and therefore the use of meta-ankoleite formation for the sequestering of uranium is unlikely to pose any significant challenges later in the process as part of waste sentencing and immobilisation for the purpose of long term disposal [17].

    4. Conclusions

    Thermodynamic properties of the uranyl phosphate mineral phase meta-ankoleite (KUO2PO4.3H2O) and a uranyl phosphate containing waste have been studied and compared. It has been shown that the meta-ankoleite mineral phase undergoes a double de-hydration event at 56.90 and 125.85℃. This having been observed in both the synthetic and real waste samples. Synthetically produced meta- ankoleite remains stable until at least 1150℃. In contrast, when present in the real waste the meta-ankoleite phase is not identifiable after thermal treatment indicating incorporation within the bulk waste either as an amorphous phase and/or as uranium oxide.

    Co-contaminants in the real waste, namely, antimony have been shown to remain unchanged under the applied thermal conditions. The co-contaminants are glass former materials and have been observed to have the added benefit of being self-sintering.

    Based on the preliminary results presented in this study, thermal treatment of the uranyl phosphate mineral phase meta-ankoleite, present within the waste, for the purpose of immobilisation should pose no detrimental effects with regards to the final wasteform.


    This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2017M2A8A5063797). The authors wish to thank Ms. Min-Jeong Kim and Miss Sumin Kwon (both formally of KAERI) for their contribution to analytical analysis throughout the project. Notes: The authors declare no competing financial interests.



    X-ray diffractogram of (a) synthetic meta-ankoleite; (b) Real waste. Insert: corresponding scanning electron microscopy images.


    Thermogravimetric data for (a) Synthetic KUO2PO4·3H2O, (b) Real uranyl phosphate containing waste.


    X-ray diffractogram of synthetic meta-ankoleite both before and after thermal treatment at 1000℃, 1100℃, and 1200℃.


    X-ray diffractogram of the real meta-ankoleite containing waste both before and after thermal treatment at 1100℃.


    Photographs of synthetic meta-ankoleite and the real waste before and after thermal treatment.


    XRF chemical compositional analysis of the real waste

    1Light elements. Elements lighter than Mg.


    1. D. Gorman-Lewis, P.C. Burns, and J.B. Fein, “Review of uranyl mineral solubility measurements”, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 40(3), 335-352 (2008).
    2. V. Vesely, V. Pekarek, and M. Abbrent, “A study on uranyl phosphates-Ⅲ solubility products of uranyl hydrogen phosphate, uranyl orthophosphate and some alkali uranyl phosphates”, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 27(5), 1159- 1166 (1965).
    3. M. Markovic, N. Pavkovic, and N.D. Pavkovic, “Precipitation of NH4UO2PO4·3H2O – solubility and structural comparison with alkali uranyl (2+) phosphates”, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 93(4), 557-563 (1988).
    4. E.A. Dzik, H.L. Lobeck, L. Zhang, and P.C. Burns, “Thermodynamic properties of phosphate members of the meta-autunite group: A high temperature calorimetric study”, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 114, 165-171 (2017).
    5. L.V. Haverbeke, R. Vochten, and K.V. Springel, “Solubility and spectrochemical characteristics of synthetic chernikovite and meta-ankoleite”, Mineral. Mag., 60(402), 759-766 (1996).
    6. J.B. Otto, “Separation of uranium from carbonate containing solutions thereof by direct precipitation”, US Patent 4,410,497 (1983).
    7. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Uranium extraction technology”, IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 359, IAEA, Vienna (1993).
    8. K.W. Kim, M.J. Kim, M.K. Oh, J. Kim, H.H. Sung, R.I. Foster, and K.Y. Lee, “Development of a treatment process and immobilization method for the volume reduction of uranium-bearing spent catalysts for final disposal”, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 55(12), 1459-1472 (2018).
    9. R.I. Foster, K.W. Kim, M.K. Oh, and K.Y. Lee, “Effective removal of uranium via phosphate addition for the treatment of uranium laden process effluents”, Water Res., 158, 82-93 (2019).
    10. M.I. Ojovan and W.E. Lee, An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, 1st ed., Elsevier, Oxford (2005).
    11. M.I. Ojovan, Handbook of Advanced Radioactive Waste Conditioning Technologies, 1st ed., Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (2011).
    12. J.H. Saling and A.W. Fentiman, Radioactive Waste Management, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, New York (2001).
    13. International Atomic Energy Agency, Conditioning of Low- and Intermediate-level Liquid and Solid Waste, IAEA Report, DCT No. 2017_C9_110 (2017).
    14. I.W. Donald, Waste Immobilization in Glass and Ceramic Based Hosts, Wiley, Chichester (2010).
    15. H.H. Sung, K.W. Kim, K.Y lee, J. Kim, and B.K. Seo, “An evaluation on the glass-ceramic solidification characteristics of uranium catalyst waste by green body pressure”, Proc. of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Fall Conference, 15(2), 217-218, October 18- 20, Changwon (2017).
    16. H.H. Sung, “The Fabrication of Glass-Ceramics Sintered from Mixed Uranium and Metal Oxide Waste and Their Characterization”, Masters Thesis, University of Science and Technology, Korea, 2018.
    17. K.W. Kim, R.I. Foster, J. Kim, H.H. Sung, D. Yang, W.J. Shon, M.K. Oh, and K.Y. Lee, “Glass-ceramic composite wasteform to immobilize and stabilize a uraniumbearing waste generated from treatment of a spent uranium catalyst”, J. Nucl. Mater., 516, 238-246 (2019).
    18. J.M. Schaekers, “Preparation and thermogravimetric study of neutral uranyl phosphate (UO2)3(PO4)2·xH2O”, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 3(4), 463-479 (1971).
    19. J.M. Schaekers, “Thermogravimetric study of uranium phosphates”, J. Therm. Anal., 6, 145-157 (1974).
    20. J.M. Schaekers, “Thermogravimetric study of uranium phosphates”, J. Therm. Anal., 6, 543-554 (1974).
    21. M. Kamo and S. Ohashi, “Thermal decomposition of uranyl dihydrogen orthophosphate trihydrate”, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 43(1), 84-89 (1970).
    22. H. Barten and E.H.P. Cordfunke, “A study on the thermal stability of uranyl phosphates (UO2)3(PO4)2, (UO2)2P2O7, and UO2(PO3)2 using a static non-isothermal method”, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 42(1), 75-78 (1980).
    23. R.I. Foster, K.W. Kim, and K.Y. Lee, “Uranyl phosphate (MUO2PO4, M = Na+, K+, NH4+) precipitation for uranium sequestering: formation and physiochemical characterisation”, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 324, 1265-1273 (2020).
    24. R.I. Foster, M.K. Oh, K.W. Kim, and K.Y. Lee, “Pilot scale treatment of a spent uranium catalyst formally used in the Sohio process: pilot plant verification of the SENSEI process”, ACS Omega, 5, 10939-10947 (2020).
    25. United States Department of Commerce, Standard Xray Diffraction Powder Patterns, National Bureau of Standards Circular 539, Vol. 10, pg. 10 (1960).
    1. SEARCH
    2. JNFCWT

      Online Submission

    3. Korean Radioactive
      Waste Society (KRS)

    4. Editorial Office
      Contact Information

      - Tel: +82-42-861-5851, 866-4205
      - Fax: +82-42-861-5852
      - E-mail: